The Last Broadcast

1998

Horror / Mystery

0
IMDb Rating 5.3

Synopsis


Downloaded 187 times
5/24/2020 1:43:21 PM

1080p
1.66G
Normal
English
/
86 min
P/S 0 / 0

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by BrandtSponseller 3

The Last Broadcast is presented as if it&#39;s a &quot;documentary&quot; about the murder of two hosts and a hired hand for a cable access show named Fact or Fiction. In the scenario, Fact or Fiction was in New Jersey&#39;s Pine Barrens to present a live show on the Jersey Devil. A second hired hand is convicted of the murders (this isn&#39;t a spoiler because it&#39;s stated at the beginning of the film). The film also makes an attempt to become more philosophical towards the end, and there is an unexpected twist.<br/><br/>For me, this film failed on most levels, although there were a few small things that worked. The Last Broadcast is often compared to The Blair Witch Project, which arrived a year later. The comparison is appropriate, and it&#39;s difficult to imagine that The Blair Witch Project writer/directors didn&#39;t lift the basic idea from The Last Broadcast. The Blair Witch Project didn&#39;t work for me, either, although in my view, it works better than The Last Broadcast does. Both films rest on a similar gimmick of claiming to be partially a composed &quot;documentary&quot; and partially a collection of videotaped images by a group of young adults who are about to get killed in the woods, and we&#39;re watching them as &quot;evidence&quot; of what happened to them. Both have ambiguity whether something supernatural happened, as the characters were exploring a legend about a supernatural being, or whether more mundane homicides occurred. There are finer-grained similarities as well, but I mainly bring it up to give you an idea of what The Last Broadcast is like if you haven&#39;t seen it but you&#39;ve seen The Blair Witch Project.<br/><br/>The first problem with The Last Broadcast is that it doesn&#39;t play like a documentary. I&#39;ve seen many documentaries. I&#39;ve never seen one that looked like The Last Broadcast. Rather, this film looks like how an amateur filmmaker who has never seen a documentary might imagine documentaries, armed only with a description of the genre. That&#39;s a big problem, because the film hinges on playing like a documentary. In a similar vein, there is a problem with the Fact or Fiction program, and the actors playing the hosts. Even though Fact or Fiction is supposed to only be a cable access show, the material is done poorly and the actors are unconvincing. Again, it looks more like an amateur filmmaker who has never seen cable access programming imagining what it would be like based on a description only.<br/><br/>Like The Blair Witch Project, another big problem with The Last Broadcast is that for some strange reason directors Stefan Avalos and Lance Weiler decided to use purposefully bad camera-work for much of the material, especially any footage shot by the Fact or Fiction guys, and footage by the documentary host, David Beard. While the idea to use purposefully bad camera-work isn&#39;t flawed, the execution is flawed, because the camera-work is so ridiculous that it again comes across like an amateur filmmaker imagining what bad camera-work might be like. Characters inexplicably will not keep the camera still (a really annoying scene showing this is when David Beard is filming himself in the woods towards the end and keeps revolving). They inexplicably have extreme close-ups of mouths, eyes, etc. If the idea is to make the documentary and the cable access show seem real, such exaggerated bad camera-work just does not work.<br/><br/>Another problem is that the documentary keeps repeating material. Most of the videotaped evidence is repeated many times. The 911 phone call is repeated. The narrator keeps repeating the same ideas over and over. It all plays like an attempt to pad out the film&#39;s running time. Also, the narrator has a very annoying monotone, which comprises the bulk of the dialogue throughout the film. It is another aspect that does not help sell the film as a documentary.<br/><br/>Finally, the attempt at becoming more philosophical about media&#39;s influence on reality perception is very sophomoric, and the big &quot;twist&quot; at the end was fairly inexplicable to me. There were a couple other small points throughout the film that were confusing to me, as well, such as why the soap opera director wasn&#39;t involved with the Pine Barrens shoot, but my attention might have drifted a couple times. I was also confused how Fact or Fiction, which was otherwise so technically bare bones and incompetent, was able to manage an audio/video as well as an Internet satellite feed miles into the woods in 1995.<br/><br/>On the plus side, the premise has promise--the story is interesting, and there are some nice shots of the woods accompanied by atmospheric music. Perhaps if the film were handled more conventionally, The Last Broadcast may have been moderately successful. Even though the twist made little sense to me, the style of the film at that point, which pulled further away from the feigned documentary, worked better for me.

Read More
Reviewed by AceTheMovieCritic 6

Let me start off by saying that if you went into this thinking it would be a Blair Witch project prequel, you are wrong. The concept is that this film is a documentary, although this would be a TV-grade &#39;mid afternoon&#39; documentary, based around the murders of 3 crew members on a program called &quot;Fact or Fiction&quot; in the New Jersey pine barrens. It&#39;s meant to look like one of those cheap afternoon shows with guys &#39;hunting&#39; for the lochness monster, or big foot, or even the Jersey Devil. One of those paranormal docs, or a murder investigation program they&#39;d have on A&amp;E or a channel like that. Something you&#39;d find in the middle of the afternoon, when nothing else was on, and get kinda creeped out watching it. That was this films goal, and they captured that cheap quality PERFECTLY! Everything about this aspect works, and it works splendidly. And it&#39;s played totally straight. The people interviewed feel authentic, and the eerie monotonous narration works, cause this is what the guys narrating the tea-time documentaries would be doing. Go watch any of those &#39;true crime&#39; type programs, and you will find this same style of narration.<br/><br/>It&#39;s this stab at the familiar that gives the film it&#39;s tone. First it presents it&#39;s alleged murderer, Jim Suerd, who is a strange and anti-social young man, who was the only survivor of the killings which ended the lives of the crew working on the fore-mentioned program. He&#39;s presented in a good, and creepy fashion. His mannerisms are awkward, and he claims to be a psychic, although we are also told that he is an amateur magician, and skilled in trickery. If the documentary was solely about him it would still feel creepy and interesting. BUT(!) When it begins to sway towards the supernatural, and the mystery of who the killer is begins to widen, tensions really begin to raise.<br/><br/>This film is brilliant on atmosphere, it really is. The tensions seem to constantly be rising, and everything seems to be building towards something...which makes it all the more aggravating that it had to have such a terrible ending. I won&#39;t spoil it for you, but I can just say that it totally butchers the mood set by the film, and is actually very jarring; as if it wasn&#39;t even part of the original project and just tacked on at the end.<br/><br/>For me, this film would have been near perfect, had it ended differently. It could have gone any direction with the several mysteries it established, as long as it kept with the tone and I&#39;d have been fine. But instead they opted for this terrible completely off tone piece of--well like I said I won&#39;t spoil it. I&#39;d say give it a watch, but the wasted potential makes for a bitter viewing. It actually made me mad that I liked the film leading up to the end, because it butchers it that immensely.<br/><br/>~6 out of 10~ For it&#39;s great capturing of a sub-genre, but loses a lot of points because of that ending. That F*****g ending..

Read More
Reviewed by MisterAwesome 3

I had this one on my watchlist for quite some time now and decided to give it a spin this evening. It started of pretty good and I was hooked, but after 30 minutes or so the movie just kept dragging on and became very boring. I noticed that I wasn&#39;t closely paying attention because of this and was eager to turn it off. After a minute or 60, it became interesting again for a few minutes but then went back to it&#39;s dragging self. <br/><br/>The movie has some similarities to the Blair Witch Project, but doesn&#39;t even come close. A lot of the found footage material was so badly shot and &#39;damaged&#39; that it wasn&#39;t even fun to watch anymore because you hardly could see anything.<br/><br/>The acting was decent at best and at some points not even convincing. The characters were dull and had very little backstory.<br/><br/>Without giving anything away, the big revelation is a big letdown and nothing is really explained about the &#39;how&#39; and &#39;why&#39;, which makes it very frustrating. <br/><br/>Don&#39;t be fooled by the 5,5 rating which is pretty good for a horror movie on IMDb these days, it&#39;s definitely not worth wasting an hour and a half on. If you haven&#39;t seen the Blair Witch Project, you should definitely view that in favor of The Last Broadcast.

Read More
Read more IMDb reviews