It's a rare feat that a director completes a documentary that is well-photographed, has a solid soundtrack, and good audio. Despite these solid features, and some highlights, this film is flawed, and unnecessarily so.<br/><br/>Some two thirds of this film contain solid interviews with contributors to the book, some reputable scholars, and Schwartz's son and wife. Glimpses of the man, a truly prolific writer, and his seemingly troubled family, are moving, insightful, and a joy to watch. Some of the scholars offer powerful considerations of the thematic content of Schwartz's memorable stories, and Gammell's incredible art. This is fantastic, and make the film worth watching.<br/><br/>Meanwhile, the controversy surrounding the book looms around the corners of the film, which the documentary comes to rest on more solidly in the end. This controversy section is boring, and more window-dressing. Like other books in history, the books themselves will persist beyond their controversies, and live and die on their own merits. Why do I care about what a PTA mother was thinking about a book in the 80s? I care about the books themselves.<br/><br/>People saying "books are important" and "sometimes people try to make them go away" and "X politically infused books are now under attack," misses the mark, and present an unnecessary diversion to some otherwise solid content. I want to know about the core of the Schwartz phenomenon- the books and their profound, masterful, chilling, and memorable content. I want to know about Schwartz the person, the author, the magician. I want a true masterful art historian to discuss Gammell's work.<br/><br/>It's a bit of a chore to wade through the other third of the film: It is front-loaded with fan interviews; a pat, badly-acted recreation and retellings; and lesser known artists talking about how cool Scary Stories are.<br/><br/>Case in point: the film opens with a musician you've never heard of. The first four minutes of the film is dedicated to his singing a song inspired by Schwartz. Later, five minutes are dedicated to a wedding photographer recreating Schwartz's work. Schwartz' grandson--who comes across as charismatic and intelligent--leafs through Schwartz's work. This young man never knew Schwartz personally, nor does he seem to have any credential beyond being a removed relative. An interesting, though again not especially important five minutes, focuses on a sculptor reproducing Gammell's iconic Scary Stories cover. But why?<br/><br/>It seems these smatterings (of which there are too many) are some attempt to link Schwartz's work to those artists alive, creating, and influenced today. But these artists (save perhaps R.L. Stine, who barely talks about the titular stories) are not monoliths. And these scenes are tiresome and overlong for an 80 minute documentary, while revelations about the works themselves are touched upon in a limited way.<br/><br/>The final scene, a staged moment between two interesting people, is exemplary of my point. For such a momentous, impactful set of books, we find ourselves seeing Schwartz's son defending the rights of children to read Scary Stories. While it's lovely to see a son standing up for his father, in my mind the film again misses such fertile material: the works themselves.
Explore the history of one of the most controversial works of modern children's literature: The best selling teen classic Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark, which scared a generation of young readers and became one of the most banned books of modern times. Scary Stories creates both the ultimate celebration and dissertation of this iconic piece of horror literature. Scary Stories features more than 40 interviews, from family members of author Alvin Schwartz, to fellow children's book horror authors like R.L Stine "Goosebumps" and Q.L. Pearce, to folklorists, artists and fans discussing the impact that the books have had on both themselves as well as the culture at large. The documentary also explores the various times in which the books were banned or targeted by parent and religious groups as 'satanic' or otherwise too macabre for its targeted teen scholastic audience.
Downloaded 972 times
7/21/2020 12:19:08 AM