Out of Reach

2004

Action / Crime

2
IMDb Rating 4.0

Synopsis


Downloaded 625 times
7/25/2020 11:54:09 PM

1080p
1.63G
Normal
English
/
88 min
P/S 4 / 9

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by supertom-3 5

The second piece of Seagal action to come out this year, the second dire straight to video offering from him as well. While Belly Of The Beast had some enjoyment laughing at the over the top action this film is so painfully bad that it is almost upsetting. Now I have never been the biggest Seagal fan. Having said that I have enjoyed watching his earlier films. They were pure dumb and ultra violent films with an enjoyably pretentious moralistic attitude. Seagal had that kind of Italian American, Brooklyn tough guy thing going on, his kind of De Niro and Brando impersonation. Since Under Siege though, he has become the eco-Zen- Warrior with absolutely no personality. He was in decent shape as well, never the ripped muscle man like Arnie, Sly and Van Damme but a real man kind of size and he was very quick. The action scenes in those films were brutal and slick and we would see in full glory the aikido from Seagal. Nowadays Seagal, after one two many pies, is looking very withered and old and overweight. In modern Seagal fights the are film extremely tightly with the odd wide shot featuring his stunt double and is edited in such a way to hide the fact that he is just not quick enough anymore. Seagal looks tragically bloated and sweaty and almost repugnant. I cannot see how even the most ardent Seagal fan could be anything but devastated seeing him do films like this and looking the way he does. Somehow he still sells a movie but at this rate it won&#39;t be for long.<br/><br/>Out Of Reach is the worst Seagal film ever, and considering Ticker, Foreigner and Out For A Kill, that takes some doing. This is a film that even z grade action men like Lorenzo Lamas and Don Wilson would want scratched off their CV. The plot has Seagal as a former government agent who runs a animal shelter (oh my god, when will he realize he&#39;s not captain planet.). He then finds out that a young girl who he is pen pals with (isn&#39;t that a horrible picture, an old sweaty git having correspondence with a little girl) is kidnapped and sold as a slave, Seagal has to come out of retirement and stop the bad guys who are lead by Matt Schulze. The film despite being a reasonable 20 million dollar budget looks painfully cheap. The film is so lazily put to together and Seagal is so bad it beggars belief. There are so many signs that he can&#39;t be bothered and is past it, form constant doubling, lazy use of a stand in and several moments when he is clearly dubbed, probably because he whispers through the while film and you can&#39;t hear him. The only times you hear what Seagal is saying is when he is being dubbed. He really doesn&#39;t want to be their and being the big name of such a crappy little picture no-one would have told him to pull his finger out. Someone needs to slap him and tell him that for the money he his paid and that they plough into his movies his fans expect a lot more. He is currently the top earner and audience grabber of the straight to video action market but if he continues like this he will be overtaken by Van Damme and Lundgren and others below them. There are rumours his next film, Into The Sun is to be distributed to theaters by his beloved Warner Brothers but I really don&#39;t see it. It is tragic and says a lot about the industry that they could make the biggest pile of poo known to man and sell it simply by plastering his ugly mug on the front.<br/><br/>I watched this simply out of curiosity and merely because it was a Seagal film, these DTV stars release these films and although they are generally bad there has to be a certain minimal standard of enjoyment. Van Damme, Lundgren are keeping this up with their recent efforts, but Seagal who has the highest expectations must up his game or retire. He certainly is not convincing as a tough guy any more. *

Read More
Reviewed by jessecrowder 1

Well, I have to say I am very disappointed. Again. I&#39;d like to start this commentary by saying that I&#39;m myself a fan of Mr. Seagal and have followed his career in motion pictures since I first saw the superb &quot;Above The Law&quot; back in 1989. This information is just to clarify, that I&#39;m not here to bash Seagal just because it seems to be the &quot;hip&quot; thing to do.<br/><br/>It&#39;s fair to say that Seagal&#39;s cv hasn&#39;t looked very impressive since &quot;Under Siege&quot; over ten years ago. It&#39;s been a slow downhill with a few exceptions like fairly enjoyable &quot;US 2&quot; and dumb but entertaining &quot;Exit Wounds&quot;. With his Hong Kong influenced &quot;Belly Of The Beast&quot; outing I dared to expect something of a comeback for our beloved thespian, but &quot;Out Of Reach&quot; sends him right back where he was with the dreadful &quot;The Foreigner&quot; and even more horrible &quot;Out For A Kill&quot;. You could sum this commentary with one sentence: no more polish action films. The production values of &quot;OOR&quot; are minimal, script has holes for trucks to go through and the acting. Oh lord, the acting. Through out the entire film it is just plain torture to watch. Let&#39;s face it - Seagal has never been exactly Oscar material, but he has had his moments. Not in this one. I just don&#39;t get why on earth they have to dub his voice with these totally moranic voice overs? And this time it happens a lot, even in the middle of the scene in where he has spoke with his own voice in the beginning. <br/><br/>Seagal has dropped some weight, but it is still a stretch to buy him as an action hero. His moves are slow (still the show them most of time in slow motion!!) and he uses stunt doubles a lot. Action in &quot;OOR&quot; is quite minimal and fairly up to basic standards even for a movie this scale. The brothel shoot out is OK, but the final duel between Seagal and Matt Schulze is a major let down. And while speaking of Mr. Schulze it should be noted that Seagal&#39;s acting really isn&#39;t the worse in &quot;OOR&quot;. Schulze, who delivered good performances in &quot;Blade 2&quot; and &quot;The Transporter&quot; is totally lost with the role of Faisal The Ultimate Bad Guy. His pseudo sophisticated character is probably one of the most lame villains ever supplied with incredibly stale dialogue.<br/><br/>Like noted, the acting in whole is pure crap and it seems that many of the polish actors don&#39;t even know English - they just repeat what the director or who ever tells them to say. There really are no good performances in &quot;OOR&quot; except the small cameo of Nick Brimble and momentarily the girl who plays Seagal&#39;s pen pal. There are numerous just idiotic scenes like the one where the little girl is held captive in the basement of a castle where villains are having a big party. She is guarded by one of the villains and asks him something like &quot;Why are you not invited to the party?&quot; The bad guy totally loses it and screams: &quot;Stop trying to get inside my head!&quot; Whoa. Then there are the goofy scenes where Seagal wanderers in the forest &quot;looking for injured animals&quot;. It is of course a beautiful concept, but the guy looks like a lost-in-the-woods member of a motorcycle gang. And the final still picture before the end credits start to roll. What the heck were they thinking in the editing room? &quot;Wow, NOW this movie works like it should!&quot;<br/><br/>I did my best to come up with even one positive thing about &quot;OOR&quot;, but it just seems impossible. How can talented(?) people mess up this bad and what in heaven&#39;s name did Seagal see in this project that made him want to get into it? Is he proud of his Poland era of film making?<br/><br/>If you are a fan of Seagal you have to ask yourself a question: did you like him as the arrogant ass kicker from his Warner Brothers days or do you prefer this independent (no big studio wants to touch him with a ten foot pole?) filmmaker -version of him? If your heart beats for his neat ponytail wearing, black leather jacket and jeans -period then do your self a favor and leave &quot;OOR&quot; alone. As sad as it might seem.<br/><br/>This was a stink bomb. Please, let &quot;Into The Sun&quot; be better.

Read More
Reviewed by argentobuff 4

After the semi-entertaining,back to basics approach of Belly of the Beast it appeared that Seagal was on a minor comeback.Then along comes out of reach to flush all that down the toilet.<br/><br/>Seagal is a retired agent(how many times can one man play a retired agent!!!)who crashes a human slavery ring in Poland headed by Matt(Transporter)Shultze.Get ready for some bone-breaking,gun-fighting,neck-breaking mania that never happens.Its not that it is totally boring,just unexceptional.<br/><br/>Out of reach is missing a lot of the trademarks that make up a Steven Seagal movie.Not a lot of hand to hand action.More gunfighting instead. The final Mano a Mano between Shultze and Seagal is just modest at best.Seagal actually takes a few hits.The setting seems like the same faceless location of his last three movies.<br/><br/>Seagal is a little better here.He handles the fights okay.But the dubbing and the raspy voice make one question his health.Ida Nowakowska holds her own and does a pretty good acting job as the cop helping Seagal.Matt Schultze is the best thing Out of reach has going for it.He plays a nasty villain as usual with high potential.But ends up wasted and Ill used.<br/><br/>Good Idea undone by producers?Bad Director?Star?Who knows.It had some potential.Its mauled by one of those freeze-frame-feel good endings.<br/><br/>I paid nearly 4 bucks to rent this and I don&#39;t feel good.

Read More
Read more IMDb reviews

Torrent Related