As a consummate and long-time fan of Richard Gere's, this was a 'musthave' for me and the acquisition was not a disappointment. As usual,Richard gave an excellent performance, for which I am neverdisappointed. Sharon Stone and Lolita Davidovich were great choices forthe female characters and effectively displayed the contrast betweenthe personalities of the women. This movie contained real aspects to aperson's dilemma's in relationships...from a sterile, business'association' with his first wife to a passionate and truly loving'real-life' affair with the woman he met in a chance encounter. Thedrama of the accident was well done and suspenseful. In the end, themost touching aspect was that neither woman wished to hurt the other bydisclosing what they each believed to be true - both were loved andwanted. I enjoyed it very much and it is a much-watched movie in myhome with all actors performing excellently. I would recommend this toanyone who enjoys a love story which is true to real-life.

I'm not quite sure what this movie's about. I'm not saying that I suspectthat I missed some deep, subtle secret concealed within the narrative thatonly a select few will ever grasp (this, I assume, is true of the allegedcomedy that I've missed in various 'comedic' films) -- rather, I'm just notentirely sure that this film delivers what it might have had it had a morecoherent flow and some semblance of actually going anywhere. Not that thatsentence that I just penned is a great example of those qualities, but Idigress...<br><br>The movie features fine performances from all involved, including LoliaDavidovich and Sharon Stone and the pretty-much-always excellent RichardGere. Gere's character is convincing and real, but perhaps a tad too realbecause he's a pretty wishy-washy fellow and his is not the most compellingof roles. Then again, neither is anyone else's, really. The two femaleleads get marginally more to wrap their skills around, but the whole is wayless than the sum of its parts. <br><br>A 98-minute film, &quot;Intersection&quot; seems a lot longer and I found myselfcalculating time-elapsed and time-remaining at more than one point. Hardlya good sign. Sure, there are no Ramboesque explosions and car chases(though a high-speed driving theme is at the movie's heart) but I'm not thetype of male who has to have that kind of thing to keep me engaged. A storymight be nice, though. I mean, a story that hangs together. In the absenceof much direction, and in the presence of multiple and confusing layers offlashback, the actors' great work is sabotaged. It just doesn't really seemto go anywhere. <br><br>When the film finished I felt the sentiment echoed in that old Peggy Leesong...&quot;Is that all there is?&quot; And I don't like Peggy Lee, darnit!

Richard Gere stars in this American-made remake of the 1970 film LesChoses de la vie of French Director Claude Sautet based on the novel byPaul Guimard. This time around Mark Rydell, who enjoyed success with OnGolden Pond, Cinderella Liberty, The Rose and The Reivers among othersis the director. Sharone Stone, Lolita Davidavich and Martin Landauround out the cast but this is clearly a Richard Gere film. AlthoughI'm generally not a fan of Gere he is excellent in this. This does havethe feel of a European film and although I've never seen the original Iwould like to. I'd likely find it better as a whole. This is a gooddrama and although not a big movie it has a good look to it. I wouldgive this a 7.0 on a scale of 10 for it's likable story and performanceby Richard Gere,